Article Index
Quad ESL-57 One Thing
Sound quality
Measured performance
All Pages

Quad  ESL-57 loudspeaker

From Hi-Fi World - October 2007 issue






One Thing Audio now offer an even better upgrade to Quad's original ESL-57 loudspeaker. Is this the electrostatic for you, wonders Noel Keywood?


As I waved my Tannoy Yorkminsters goodbye, tear in my eye, I was dreaming of my next affair. There’s always another, different experience around the corner. The notion of a perfect electrostatic was on my mind and, as if reading it from afar, a pair of revamped, tuned Quad ESL-57 electrostatic loudspeakers arrived in the office from One Thing Audio. The large spaces left by the outgoing Tannoys were promptly filled and my tears vanished...

The ESL-57 was Quad’s first ever electrostatic loudspeaker. Introduced in 1957, it is still popular today, retaining value as a classic. However, the ‘57 was always a little fragile and most around today, with a good forty years use under their belt, are barely working. One Thing provide a unique rebuild service for this loudspeaker: they equip it with new, improved panels, and revamp it to provide a level of performance considerably better than the original.

If you already have a pair of 57s, the upgrade costs an affordable and highly reasonable £1,450. To that, add £235 per pair for the Rupert wooden stands you see in our pictures, and £79.95 per pair for Widgets (yes, that’s their official name) that make the loudspeakers a friendlier load for transistor amps. You end up with a loudspeaker that’s not only a classic but, we have found from past experience, frighteningly good by today’s standards. Which is why I was dreaming of electrostatics again when the Tannoys went...


If you are wondering why the ESL-57 looks like a radiator - a common accusation - it’s because it is a panel loudspeaker. To be precise, each one uses three sheets of Clingfilm - or something like it in truth - to produce sound. One sheet, tensioned in a frame to form a panel, sits vertically at centre, radiating high frequencies. Either side of it are bass panels - hence the oblong proportions of the composite whole. The louvred metal covers let sound out, front and back, whilst preventing inquisitive little fingers from getting in, because lethal voltages exist inside; these speakers are mains powered.


I had a long talk with One Thing about what they do with the ESL-57 and its technology in general because, as you might imagine from someone who dreams about such things(!) I am more than a little interested. I did, after all, run ESL-63s for many years, modifying them heavily and finding there was always more to come.


One Thing can accept just about any ESL-57, irrespective of condition, and renovate it fully. If you don’t already own a pair, then they should cost around £400 per pair second hand, but having said that some ask for much more, up to £1,000. One Thing recommend people buy tatty ones cheap, as good ones are likely to be good looking rather than good sounding, and One Thing replace all important parts and can even fit new grilles. All you need to be aware of is that models predating 1960, with a Serial Number below 1200, are balanced for mono, having less treble energy due to fewer turns on the audio transformer’s high frequency secondary winding. So pairs should have similar Serial Numbers to avoid a pairing of old and new models, which sometimes happens, and which One Thing cannot rectify, as the audio transformers are different.


The ultra light film diaphragms of electrostatics follow musical waveforms with unnerving accuracy, magically banishing screechy violins caused by the wayward cones and dome tweeters of conventional box loudspeakers. The lighter the film, the less energy it stores to colour the sound, and the faster it accelerates and decelerates, to better follow the music. In this respect electrostatics are way ahead of cone loudspeakers, something that is audibly very apparent.


Whilst Quads and other electrostatics traditionally used difficult to obtain special DuPont films, One Thing went to Germany and ordered an industrial quantity of a specially manufactured film 2.8microns thick, compared to 6microns of the original. This is coated with a highly resistive conductive film so the surface holds charge, resisting charge migration. I was surprised to learn that One Thing also fit high voltage secondary protection circuits of the sort used in later ESL-63s, which from experience I know work well. So their upgraded ESL-57s are all but bullet proof, which is good to know because I remember the originals being prone to arcing when overdriven. Additionally, they fit improved front electrodes to better disperse mid and high frequencies, and stronger rear electrodes. All in all then, this is a very modern electrostatic, to the pattern of the original, but otherwise broadly updated. Only the audio transformer is retained.


Some solid-state amplifiers find electrostatics difficult to drive - meaning they blow up! Mindful of this, One Thing offer a Widget that makes the Quad an easier load (it is a reactive network, not just series resistance). This, they find, improves sound quality with solid state amplifiers. With valve amplifiers it has least affect, they told me. With the Almarro valve amplifier I used, it offered a small subjective improvement, adding just a little body to voices. All the same, with it or without it the ESL-57s sound bright in their balance, due to a +5dB lift at high frequencies our measurements show, which is quite a lot. I would be tempted to equalise them flat. One Thing said many listeners prefer this balance, and it does mimic the lift found in many modern loudspeakers. I am used to a ‘flat’, neutral balance that is gentler with DVD-A, which tends to sound brittle in any case; the 57s were also bright with much SACD, even though it has subtler treble than DVD-A, but they were better balanced with most LPs.

Comments (5)
Quad ELS 57
5Friday, 28 November 2014 17:40
Misha Norland
I have owned and loved these speakers since 1965. Recently serviced by One Thing Audio they have new life! There really is nothing to touch them, for installed in the right situation and driven by a good front end, the sound and staging is amazingly clear and shockingly life-like.
4Friday, 31 October 2014 14:29
carl hebb
Wish I had kept my late 57s. Years later I have not forgotten how wonderful they were, despite critical listening position. I have rebuilt 63s tucked away in a bedroom and stored that come out from time to time but they are just not the same. Carl.
One Thing Audio Quad 57's
3Monday, 02 June 2014 19:26
I don't think they are bright just new, a new pair of Quad 57 from Quad if you could still get them may sound bright due to being up to spec.
Quads not normally bright
2Monday, 09 December 2013 20:04
It sounds like they've modified the Quads and changed their warm character.

They haven't returned them to factory specs.

I agree with Manolis that original Quads aren't bright.

The One Thing Quad is a different animal.

Yes, the One Thing has a brighter balance, or you could say it is less warm. NK
ESL 57s rool!
1Monday, 07 November 2011 19:47
Manolis Kroussaniotakis
Thanks to your magazine, I got a used pair over 10 years ago, and listen only to LPs through a Rock II, EAR834P (again, your recommendation back then) and a Quad 405-II. Wow!

They will not be at the level of these reviewed here, but you know, wow! I had the panels replaced by Quad, Germany and also fitted a clamp.

It might be my ears/room but I do not hear them as bright, and I find tuneful bass that vibrates things my Castle Pembroke's could never. I listen to Heavy Rock and Blues mostly.

Now, I would like to hear them with a decent valve amp, but out here in Cyprus, options are kinda limited. And then there's that budget issue.

Like, wow! And you know, the space issue is very real, but consider this- all other speakers are "good enough" but none match these, life is too short, so get yourself a rectangular room, call it a "studio" (photos for me, art or music for you) and let the rest of the world and your nagging other half just, well, nag. They are that worth it :)

Add your comment

Your name:
  The word for verification. Lowercase letters only with no spaces.
Word verification:


Hi-Fi World, Powered by Joomla!; Hosted by Joomla Wired.